🤖 AI News Summary - 2026-10-12 20:46 GMT+8
🤖 AI News Summary - 2026-10-12 20:46 GMT+8
Focused AI/dev subreddit roundup.
Full site: https://ai-news-summary.pages.dev/
What changed since last run
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next on six 3090s with vLLM: 7 users at 262k, 6.5k t/s prefill, 57 t/s decode solo / 206 t/s aggregate with all 7 generating. Fixes for the upstream included. — r/LocalLLaMA
- Shipping notes from an evidence-first local retrieval layer for agents — r/llmdevs
- A Love Letter — r/OpenWebUI
- Decision 3.0: open, multimodal decision models from 0.6B to 27B. Ranks #1 on both Jev Decision Index boards — r/LocalLLaMA
- Llama cpp new native reasoning slider in OpenWebui 0.12.0 — r/OpenWebUI
- Big G is still hosting my email (for now), but I’ve been on a slow mission to replace the rest of their services with self-hosted ones. Been running Immich instead of G Photos for over a year now, Jellyfin for a few years, and most of the rest the better part of the year, at least. Here’s my stack. — r/selfhosted
- Day 7 - tibo — r/Codex
- Dispatcharr - I didn’t know — r/selfhosted
- I made a free Minecraft mod where Claude builds whatever you describe — r/ClaudeAI
- OpenAI Ads - warning — r/openai
- Opus 5.5 flags and blocks every single request for me — r/ClaudeCode
- Opus 5.5 is INSANE at decompilation / ports — r/ClaudeAI
r/openai
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenAI Ads - warning | To all those who are considering using OpenAI Ads, this is what is happening to me (my company): - We created a campaign - We connected all relevant ids to my Google Analytics - We followed it for a few days/weeks - We became very skeptical as the numbers to not align with GA, OpenAI charging me for dozens of claimed… | 2026-10-12 18:00 GMT+8 | /u/samuelhalff | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters largely view the report as a warning about potentially unreliable OpenAI Ads billing and attribution, with one commenter recommending blocking the vendor through the card issuer and another stressing that billing errors are unacceptable. The main disagreement is whether the mismatch resulted from the user’s account/session handling or OpenAI’s login logic; the comments do not independently establish which explanation is correct. Overall sentiment — post: concerned; author: mixed. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 18:29 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=positive — They sympathize with the author and say the report deterred them from setting up an OpenAI ad account. | 2026-10-12 19:04 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=neutral — They suggest contacting the credit card company to block the vendor, based on having done something similar… | 2026-10-12 20:05 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=critical — They argue that the author should take responsibility for losing track of which account was used and… | |
| 2 | Thank god | [Image: Thank god] Thank God the no 5-hour limits and same weekly usage is going to win. I don’t know about y’all but I’m quite happy with the weekly limits, to be honest. | 2026-10-12 00:52 GMT+8 | /u/Frosty-iron-0405 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters broadly support removing the 5-hour limit, with one non-Pro user also preferring its removal, and some heavy users saying it is difficult to hit at current speeds. The main caveat is distrust that the provider could silently reduce weekly usage, increase token consumption, or otherwise nerf the allowance; commenters view the fixed 5-hour rule as a less manipulable variable, while weekly limits remain opaque and controllable. One commenter specifically says an x200 allowance lasts about a day under heavy use or three days normally and argues that resets obscure true weekly consumption. Overall sentiment — post: positive; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 00:59 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — They support the apparent removal only cautiously, predicting the provider could silently restore a 1x… | 2026-10-12 01:21 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They agree that weekly usage could also be reduced but value removing the 5-hour limit because it eliminates… | 2026-10-12 11:34 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They argue that a removed 5-hour limit cannot be hidden as easily, whereas the weekly usage limit can be… |
r/LocalLLaMA
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next on six 3090s with vLLM: 7 users at 262k, 6.5k t/s prefill, 57 t/s decode solo / 206 t/s aggregate with all 7 generating. Fixes for the upstream included. | Write-up, serve command and raw data: https://github.com/lukolszewski/vllm (https://github.com/lukolszewski/vllm) This shows vLLM fixes and setup that let you put PLE on SSD and save 108GB of system RAM, use int8 kv and squeeze more users in your VRAM without the performace hit of fp8. Speeds in comparison to my… | 2026-10-12 16:37 GMT+8 | /u/flynth92 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters are skeptical that the reported gains demonstrate an apples-to-apples improvement, pointing out that the setup uses more RAM and a newer, roughly twice-as-expensive card. They specifically ask for actual single-user full-262k-context and seven-user simultaneous-262k-context numbers plus configuration details, while questioning whether seven such users can fit in 64GB of VRAM; no commenter directly validates the reported vLLM, int8 KV, or SSD-PLE optimizations. Overall sentiment — post: skeptical; author: skeptical. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 19:37 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=skeptical — They reduce the result to having more RAM and being more expensive, implying the performance comparison is… | 2026-10-12 20:23 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=skeptical — They question whether seven users at 262k context can actually fit simultaneously within 64GB of VRAM. | 2026-10-12 20:21 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=skeptical — They argue that a card released four years later and costing twice as much being faster is unsurprising, and… | |
| 2 | Decision 3.0: open, multimodal decision models from 0.6B to 27B. Ranks #1 on both Jev Decision Index boards | [Image: Decision 3.0: open, multimodal decision models from 0.6B to 27B. Ranks #1 on both Jev Decision Index boards] With the vLLM Semantic Router team we released Decision 3.0 (d3), our new SOTA decision model family ranging from 0.6B to 27B, Apache-2.0, all reading text, images and video. | 2026-10-12 13:26 GMT+8 | /u/henzy123 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters are broadly interested in using Decision 3.0 for model routing, and they report emerging inference support across SGLang, llama.cpp, LM Studio, and a merged-but-not-yet-official vLLM PR available only in nightly builds. The main caveat is ecosystem maturity: users are unsure whether inference requires custom Python libraries, and one commenter says some decision models running through GGUF/llama.cpp truncate output by omitting probabilities; operators should verify runtime support and output fidelity before deploying. Overall sentiment — post: positive; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 13:37 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — The commenter welcomed Decision 3.0 as something they could try for model routing. | 2026-10-12 14:07 GMT+8: post=neutral, author=neutral — The commenter asked whether decision models already have an inference application or currently require pure… | 2026-10-12 15:07 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=neutral — The commenter wants a llama.cpp-style runtime without per-model Python dependencies and cautions that some… |
r/llmdevs
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shipping notes from an evidence-first local retrieval layer for agents | I’m the maintainer of a free, open-source local search and MCP tool, and I just shipped version 1.1.0. I’m sharing the engineering trade-offs openly rather than presenting this as a product pitch. | 2026-10-12 19:21 GMT+8 | /u/Deep_Bus_7488 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): The comments strongly support the evidence-first design, specifically viewing the stale-source rejection test as more valuable for real-world reliability than numerous happy-path demos. The maintainer invites testing in repository and agent workflows to uncover false stale reports, missed changes, and unclear results, making concrete bug reports or usage notes the main operator takeaway. Overall sentiment — post: positive; author: positive. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 19:25 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They argue that the stale-source rejection test is likely to catch more real-world failures than a hundred… | 2026-10-12 19:33 GMT+8: post=positive, author=positive — The maintainer explains that stale-source checks prevent agents from trusting excerpts that no longer match… |
r/OpenWebUI
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Open WebUI 0.12.0: REALTIME VOICE calls are here. TWO-FACTOR sign-in, shared chats you can reply in, Tool Search, Model Controls, VERSION CONTROLS, Redesigned Knowledge Base and Model Editor and a more visible CURSOR. 339 changes, our LARGEST RELEASE EVER. | [Image: Open WebUI 0.12.0: REALTIME VOICE calls are here. TWO-FACTOR sign-in, shared chats you can reply in, Tool Search, Model Controls, VERSION CONTROLS, Redesigned Knowledge Base and Model Editor and a more visible CURSOR. | 2026-10-11 06:21 GMT+8 | /u/ClassicMain | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Comments are strongly positive about Open WebUI 0.12.0, with users highlighting much better speed and usability, mid-turn compaction being addressed, and the release’s broad feature set; one user says the improved scrollbar alone would matter. The main operator caveat is realtime voice model availability: commenters ask about locally hostable options such as Qwen 3 Omni, while the response says any model should work only when its server or API supports the OpenAI Realtime API. Overall sentiment — post: positive; author: positive. Reply threads: 2026-10-11 06:37 GMT+8: post=positive, author=positive — They thank the team and ask whether realtime voice can use a locally hostable model such as Qwen 3 Omni… | 2026-10-11 06:40 GMT+8: post=positive, author=positive — They clarify that any model can work through a server or API supporting the OpenAI Realtime API, which leaves… | 2026-10-11 17:28 GMT+8: post=positive, author=positive — After previously criticizing performance, they report that the release is much faster and more usable and say… | |
| 2 | Open WebUI 0.12.0: REALTIME VOICE with Mistral | Did anybody succeed in configuring the new Realtime Voice feature using Mistral API ? While trying I’m getting “Connection Failed” when I start the call. | 2026-10-11 17:55 GMT+8 | /u/Beginning_Divide3765 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters agree that Open WebUI’s Realtime Voice is currently OpenAI-only and does not conform to the OpenAI Realtime API when used with the Mistral API, explaining the reported connection failure. The feature is described as experimental, with non-OpenAI support expected in the future, so operators should not expect Mistral compatibility yet. Overall sentiment — post: skeptical; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-11 19:21 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — They suggest that the Mistral API is not compatible with the OpenAI Realtime API required by the feature. | 2026-10-12 17:49 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=neutral — They clarify that Realtime Voice is currently an experimental OpenAI-exclusive feature and say broader… | |
| 3 | Theme Designer Pro v1.10.0: every user can now have their own theme. Personal themes in Settings that follow your account to every device, the AI Color Consultant is back, theme Open WebUI from a chat with the Launcher, and your themes from the old Tool carry over. | [Image: Theme Designer Pro v1.10.0: every user can now have their own theme. Personal themes in Settings that follow your account to every device, the AI Color Consultant is back, theme Open WebUI from a chat with the Launcher, and your themes from the old Tool carry over.] I just released Theme Designer Pro v1.10.0,… | 2026-10-11 07:36 GMT+8 | /u/Silentoplayz | ||
| 4 | A Love Letter | I wanted to take the time to say thank you Dev’s for the work you’ve put into this tool. I am relatively new to AI but immediately was against ChatGPT/claude/some other closed ecosystem of models for privacy. | 2026-10-12 02:04 GMT+8 | /u/DobbyDoesDallas | ||
| 5 | Llama cpp new native reasoning slider in OpenWebui 0.12.0 | [Image: Llama cpp new native reasoning slider in OpenWebui 0.12.0] https://preview.redd.it/cup7f3bwkwuh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=3320c8b3fa3f176e78e85e8bc95ad857c5d856eb (https://preview.redd.it/cup7f3bwkwuh1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=3320c8b3fa3f176e78e85e8bc95ad857c5d856eb) Option Parameter… | 2026-10-12 05:08 GMT+8 | /u/iChrist | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters generally welcome the native reasoning control in OpenWebUI 0.12.0, but note that it currently must be configured model by model under Model Controls and may be awkward to discover or persist. Operators also need separate sampling parameters for thinking versus non-thinking modes; one user reports vLLM exposes a reasoning_effort parameter, while others suggest shareable presets or marketplace/GitHub configurations to avoid repeated manual setup. The main caveats are a value-disappearing issue during setup and criticism that the UI redundantly labels the slider as being for reasoning. Overall sentiment — post: positive; author: positive. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 05:36 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They clarify that the feature is currently configured per model by opening Edit and setting it under Model… | 2026-10-12 05:42 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=neutral — They initially report that the configured value keeps disappearing, indicating a possible persistence or… | 2026-10-12 06:20 GMT+8: post=positive, author=positive — They praise the feature while warning that thinking and non-thinking modes require different sampling… |
r/selfhosted
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Big G is still hosting my email (for now), but I’ve been on a slow mission to replace the rest of their services with self-hosted ones. Been running Immich instead of G Photos for over a year now, Jellyfin for a few years, and most of the rest the better part of the year, at least. Here’s my stack. | [Image: Big G is still hosting my email (for now), but I’ve been on a slow mission to replace the rest of their services with self-hosted ones. Been running Immich instead of G Photos for over a year now, Jellyfin for a few years, and most of the rest the better part of the year, at least. | 2026-10-12 08:20 GMT+8 | /u/theslinkyvagabond | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): The stack is received positively, with commenters appreciating the self-hosted migration and asking practical questions about backups, Arch as a server OS, SearXNG access, and the roles of Tailscale, Pangolin, and router WireGuard. The main caveat is operational: the author has nearly 22 TB of media but only nightly onsite backups for photos and documents on a separate 4 TB disk, while commenters argue offsite backup should be implemented immediately; the author also notes Arch works well as a server if updates are actively managed. Overall sentiment — post: positive; author: positive. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 08:29 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They compliment the setup and ask for details about backup, Arch as a server OS, SearXNG routing through a… | 2026-10-12 09:20 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — The author says backups are currently limited to nightly onsite copies of photos and documents on a separate… | 2026-10-12 14:31 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=neutral — They recommend using Duplicacy with Backblaze B2 for inexpensive offsite backups and warn that disaster… | |
| 2 | Dispatcharr - I didn’t know | [Image: Dispatcharr - I didn’t know] I was about to delete Dispatcharr as I have UHF and would just sort through and find what I want to watch. Just before I deleted I found the plugins section and omg I’m so happy I found this before I deleted. | 2026-10-12 10:46 GMT+8 | /u/scotsman08 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters strongly endorse Dispatcharr’s plugin ecosystem as the reason it is worth keeping, highlighting EPG Janitor, Event Channel Managarr, Ranked Matchups, Lineuparr, and Mapparr for cleaning EPG data, filtering channels, ranking sports, and selecting the best stream across multiple sources. The practical takeaway is that plugins can turn an unwieldy IPTV setup into a curated lineup, although configuration may require guidance and one commenter says they use Claude for settings; the post was also temporarily removed pending an explanation of AI use, without comments evaluating that moderation decision. Overall sentiment — post: positive; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 11:04 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They found Dispatcharr compelling enough to start setting it up immediately and asked which plugins others… | 2026-10-12 11:19 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They described EPG Janitor, Event Channel Managarr, and Ranked Matchups, including fuzzy EPG matching,… | 2026-10-12 11:48 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They said Lineuparr and Mapparr solve their IPTV problem by filtering thousands of irrelevant channels and… |
r/ClaudeAI
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I made a free Minecraft mod where Claude builds whatever you describe | [Image: I made a free Minecraft mod where Claude builds whatever you describe] I made a Minecraft mod for Claude Code and it’s free You press K in game and tell it what you want like a medieval castle with a moat and Claude builds it in your world while you keep playing. Don’t like it and one click undoes everything I… | 2026-10-12 09:03 GMT+8 | /u/DutyOnly4308 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Comments acknowledge the concept as appealing, but the concrete discussion centers on trust and transparency: the mod is closed source, not yet on Modrinth or CurseForge, and distributed from craftai.world with a posted JAR checksum. Some commenters argue it can be decompiled or recreated with three Opus prompts, while others note decompiled JVM code is not equivalent to the original source; the practical operator takeaway is to treat the download cautiously and verify the checksum until the project is published through established channels. Overall sentiment — post: mixed; author: skeptical. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 09:20 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=neutral — They clarify that the mod is closed source, unavailable on Modrinth or CurseForge, and currently downloadable… | 2026-10-12 09:46 GMT+8: post=positive, author=critical — They call the project great but argue that AI-built software should be open source. | 2026-10-12 10:10 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=skeptical — They describe the release as suspicious and dismiss concerns about copying by saying others could build the… | |
| 2 | Opus 5.5 is INSANE at decompilation / ports | [Image: Opus 5.5 is INSANE at decompilation / ports] Just decompiled and natively ported StarFox, StarFox 2 and Sonic CD to Windows, Mac and Linux, using Opus 5.5 without REA or similar skills. Claude analyzed the games’ roms, built high level hardware runtimes, and added quality of life improvements (resolution,… | 2026-10-12 08:12 GMT+8 | /u/CarlosGOAT09 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Comments largely express astonishment or curiosity about the claimed Claude capability, but they do not technically verify the decompilation or porting results. The main substantive caveat is legal risk around distributing decompiled game code, while another commenter questions how guardrails allowed it; a separate anecdote claims Claude plus local tools can crack software plugins in minutes to hours. Overall sentiment — post: mixed; author: mixed. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 09:36 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=critical — They warn the author not to publish decompiled code because of legality and recommend keeping it private… | 2026-10-12 12:03 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They report using Claude and local tools to crack software plugins, with runtimes ranging from about 10… | 2026-10-12 13:40 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — They specifically question why safety guardrails did not stop the claimed decompilation activity. |
r/ClaudeCode
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Opus 5.5 flags and blocks every single request for me | I work in computational biology in academia, far away from application and nowhere near the sort of work that could be seen as dangerous (i.e. nothing close to bioweapons, not even using real world data). | 2026-10-12 19:48 GMT+8 | /u/Disastrous-Okra-2023 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): The substantive replies generally view blocking harmless computational-biology work, especially with synthetic data, as an overblocking and reliability problem; one commenter recommends a minimal reproducible prompt, cross-model comparison, and Anthropic support escalation, while another suggests applying for a research program with more lenient access. A separate commenter reports Claude blocking basic orbital hybridization and an SVG, but the thread also contains sarcasm, jokes, and an unsupported accusation that the poster was banned, so the evidence is anecdotal rather than a verified platform-wide behavior. Overall sentiment — post: concerned; author: mixed. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 19:50 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=positive — They call refusal of harmless synthetic-data computational-biology requests a serious reliability issue and… | 2026-10-12 19:51 GMT+8: post=neutral, author=positive — They suggest that Anthropic may have an application program granting researchers access to models with more… | 2026-10-12 19:58 GMT+8: post=concerned, author=neutral — They report that Claude 5.5 Sonnet refused to explain basic orbital hybridization and generate an SVG before… | |
| 2 | Weekly Showcase Thread; What are you building with Claude Code? | Weekly Showcase Thread Built something with Claude Code this week? Apps, tools, experiments, scripts, websites, workflows, open-source projects — anything you’ve been working on is welcome. | 2026-10-12 19:32 GMT+8 | /u/AutoModerator | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): The thread shows positive participation through showcases including a game, the Mac app iknowmymac.com, a free browser-based hobbyist 3D painter at pawlette.app, and skills for generating high-quality landing pages. There is no substantive criticism, implementation detail, or operator feedback in these comments, so the practical takeaway is breadth of projects and interest rather than evidence about Claude Code workflows or deployment tradeoffs. Overall sentiment — post: positive; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 19:35 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — The commenter shared a game through a linked video without providing technical details. | 2026-10-12 19:48 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — The commenter showcased the Mac app iknowmymac.com and said they are adding features for developers. | 2026-10-12 19:50 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — The commenter presented pawlette.app, a free browser-based 3D painter positioned as a more hobby-focused… |
r/Codex
| # | Post | Summary | Time | Score | Author | Community reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Day 7 - tibo | [Image: Day 7 - tibo] Day 7 by tibo, for me this is actually relevant and I like it! | 2026-10-12 07:47 GMT+8 | /u/Mentalist3021 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Commenters see practical value in the change because calls beyond 272k context no longer incur the former 2.5x fee or consume usage at that rate, while others question whether the update is necessary if the workflow already worked without it. The discussion also cautions that larger context is not automatically better: optimal settings depend on the workload, and repeated tool calls can trigger compaction cycles; one commenter additionally advises verifying that the purported Tibo post is genuine. Overall sentiment — post: mixed; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 07:49 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — The commenter does not validate the post and instead warns readers to verify that it is really from Tibo by… | 2026-10-12 07:49 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — They question the claimed relevance of the update if the same task could already be completed without it. | 2026-10-12 07:50 GMT+8: post=positive, author=neutral — They argue that many users previously lacked guidance on an optimal context value and emphasize that context… | |
| 2 | They could let each user choose 5 hour limits with 2x, or not | [Image: They could let each user choose 5 hour limits with 2x, or not] I wish there was some way to get this to Tibo. Maybe someone will like this, take it, and post it on a popular Twitter account that might show in his feed. | 2026-10-12 01:27 GMT+8 | /u/jamespharvey20 | Community reaction (argon/gpt-5.6-luna): Most commenters are skeptical that the proposed choice between a five-hour limit and 2x access would be implemented fairly, viewing limits as deliberate throttling and a possible path from Plus and Pro toward a €500 plan; several distrust that 2x would remain in place. Practical concerns include restarting a dead process every five hours and the possibility that different schedules produce similar or lower total token usage, while one commenter likes the limit as a reminder to take breaks. The operator takeaway is that user-selectable limits could shift inconvenience rather than improve capacity unless the multiplier, total volume, and plan policies are clearly protected. Overall sentiment — post: skeptical; author: neutral. Reply threads: 2026-10-12 11:10 GMT+8: post=critical, author=neutral — They suspect the service would move users to five-hour limits and then reduce the promised 2x multiplier to… | 2026-10-12 14:46 GMT+8: post=critical, author=neutral — They describe moving from Plus to Pro after five-hour limits made the subreddit unusable, then seeing Pro… | 2026-10-12 15:51 GMT+8: post=skeptical, author=neutral — They argue the provider is intentionally choosing between throttling peak-time or burst users with five-hour… |
Generated 2026-10-12 20:46 GMT+8 | Next update in 2 hours
No posts match your search.